Campaign: No Name by Loblaws
StrategyAnalyticsPaid MediaCreative
A What If Portfolio Project
BRANDS
SHRANK
THE BAG.
NO NAME
DIDN'T.
+95.5%
Real inflation · Doritos 2014 to 2026
5
Products analyzed
$1.4M
Proposed media budget
The Concept

Since 2021, brands like Doritos, Cheerios, and Coca-Cola have been quietly shrinking their product sizes while raising prices at the same time. No Name has not. Their butter is still 454 grams. Nobody is advertising this. This campaign makes No Name the brand that does.

The gap this campaign fills
+114%
Cost per gram increase · No Name Butter · 2014 to 2026
Start With The Calculator
Campaign designed for: No Name by Loblaws · Canadian grocery market · 2026
Scroll to explore ↓
ShrinkflationSame SizeNo TricksSay SoNo Spin454 gramsNo NameStill The SameHonest Since 1978ShrinkflationSame SizeNo TricksSay SoNo Spin454 gramsNo NameStill The SameHonest Since 1978
Section 01 / The Problem

THE BAG
GOT SMALLER.
THE BILL DIDN'T.

"Doritos. Same bag. 65g less. Same shelf."

Package size cut 23.2% between 2014 and 2026. Price up 50.1%. Nobody said a word.

Frito-Lay Canada · Tracked via Numerator
"Canadians paid $6.5B more in 2023 for the same groceries."

Shrinkflation combined with price hikes created the largest real cost increase in 40 years of Canadian grocery history.

Dalhousie University Agri-Food Analytics Lab · 2023
"67% of Canadians say grocery chains lost their trust since 2022."

Galen Weston testified before a parliamentary committee. Trust in grocery brands hit a decade low and has not recovered.

Leger Research · 2025
"No brand has publicly claimed the honesty lane. Yet."

The white space is open. The consumer anger is real. The only thing missing is a brand bold enough to say it out loud.

The gap this campaign fills
The insight
"THE BRAND THAT PUBLISHES THIS INDEX PUBLICLY AND STANDS BEHIND IT OWNS THE HONESTY LANE IN CANADIAN GROCERY."

That brand is No Name. And this is the campaign that gets them there.

The Evidence — Scroll to explore
Eight years of receipts.
2018
Doritos
Bag shrinks from 280g to 255g
+7.5%
2018
No Name Butter
Still 454g. Always has been.
Held steady
2019
Charmin
Sheet count drops from 264 to 244 per roll
+16.7%
2021
Cheerios
Box drops from 540g to 460g
+10%
2021
Coca-Cola
2L bottle becomes 1.75L
+8.7%
2021
No Name Butter
Still 454g. No changes.
Held steady
2023
Doritos
Another cut: 235g drops to 220g
+14.6%
2024
Charmin
Sheet count hits 189 — was 264 in 2014
+25%
2024
Cheerios
Further reduction to 430g
+14.5%
2024
No Name Butter
Still 454g. Year 43 of no changes.
Held steady
2026
Coca-Cola
1.75L becomes 1.5L — down 25% from 2014
+65.3% per mL
2026
No Name Butter
Still 454g.
Held steady
Data modeled for illustrative purposes based on publicly reported package changes and retail pricing.
Section 02 / The Calculator

DO THE MATH
YOURSELF.

Pick any product. Pick two years. See exactly how much more you are actually paying per unit once you account for both the price hike and the package shrink. Every time someone shares a result, No Name gets a free organic impression.

Select a product
Compare From
Compare To
Package size — 2014 vs 2026
2014 — original size280g
280g
2026 — current size215g
215g
65g you are no longer getting
2014
280g
$3.99
2026
215g
$5.99
Real inflation rate you actually paid
+95.5%

Between 2014 and 2026, the sticker price went up 50.1% while the package shrank 23.2%.

Size shrink
-23.2%
Price hike
+50.1%
Trust tax
+95.5%
Downloads as PNG
Unit price over time (cents per g) — Doritos Nacho Cheese
Source: Retail price tracking via Numerator and Loblaws flyer archives.

Data is modeled for illustrative purposes based on publicly reported package size changes and retail price tracking. This is a portfolio concept, not a live data product.

No Name
SAME SIZE.
NO TRICKS.
SAY SO.
454g · Since 1981
THE BRANDS
ABOVE SHRANK.
NO NAME
DID NOT.

That gap — 45 years of unchanged package sizes in a category that has been quietly shrinking everything around it — is the campaign. The brand that says it out loud wins the honesty lane.

Section 03 / The Brand Strategy

WHY NO NAME.
WHY NOW.
WHY THIS WORKS.

The strategic thinking behind every decision — starting with consumer trust data, identifying the white space, picking the right challenger, and building proof directly into the campaign mechanic.

01
67%
of Canadians distrust grocery brands

The Trust Vacuum

Per Leger 2025, 67% of Canadians say grocery chains lost their trust since 2022. Galen Weston hearings are still fresh. No brand has publicly claimed the honesty lane. The white space is wide open.

02
1978
Year No Name launched. Still the same.

The Challenger Pick

No Name by Loblaws is the only brand with the scale, the yellow simplicity, and the no-nonsense DNA to credibly own this moment. Loblaws was hauled before a parliamentary committee for price gouging. Running a radical transparency campaign through No Name is so audacious it either fails completely or becomes the most talked-about campaign of the year. The yellow label that has meant nothing fancy since 1978 suddenly means something. That is not a liability. That is the brief.

"THAT IS NOT A LIABILITY. THAT IS THE BRIEF."
03
0
Brands currently publishing a shrinkflation index

The Proof, Not the Promise

Consumers will not believe another "we care" statement. The campaign centres a public interactive index they can check themselves, updated quarterly. Transparency as the media asset — not the press release.

04
43%
Projected CAC reduction vs benchmark

The Conversion Ladder

Someone shares the calculator result on TikTok. A new visitor lands on the index. They subscribe to the Price Lock Newsletter — a weekly alert showing which products held their size. That list feeds PC Optimum retargeting. Receipt scan closes the loop. Every step is measurable. CAC projected 43% below the No Name digital benchmark because the index does the awareness and trust work before a single retargeting dollar is spent.

Section 04 / The Campaign Creative

FOUR FORMATS.
ONE BRAND.
ZERO COMPROMISES.

The campaign thesis: in a category defined by quiet betrayal, the loudest thing a brand can do is tell the boring truth. Minimal copy. Zero stunt. Receipts only.

Click any ad to view full size · Arrow keys to navigate

OOH / Toronto Transit
Click to expand
OOH / Toronto Transit
Still 454g. Still butter. Not math.
01 / 04No Name · 2026
Print / Globe and Mail
Click to expand
Print / Globe and Mail
We counted so you don't have to.
The same size since 1981.
02 / 04No Name · 2026
Digital / Meta + TikTok
Click to expand
Digital / Meta + TikTok
No shrink. No spin. No Name, since forever.
03 / 04No Name · 2026
Social / Organic TikTok
Click to expand
Social / Organic TikTok
454 grams of butter. Still 454 grams.
We checked. Then we checked again.
04 / 04No Name · 2026
Section 05 / The Paid Media Plan

A $1.4M
90-DAY
CAMPAIGN.

Every number is tied to a specific channel rationale and a specific conversion outcome. Nothing is a guess. YouTube Pre-Roll is included to capture high-intent search audiences actively looking up food prices — a proven feeder audience for the calculator.

Total Budget
$1.4M
Modeled to match No Name's 2024 campaign spend — the largest media investment in 40 years for the brand.
Projected CAC
$8.20
43% below industry-average Canadian FMCG digital CAC. The index generates organic awareness before a single paid dollar.
Projected Reach
11.2M
Canadian adults 25 to 54 across TTC OOH, Globe and Mail, Meta Canada, and TikTok Canada.
Earned Media
4x+
Shrinkflation is an active story in Canadian media. Publishing this index generates press without a single PR pitch.
Budget allocation ($K · 90-day flight) — Click any channel for rationale
Meta + TikTok
$480K
Highest reach with 25-44 Canadian grocery buyers. Calculator share mechanic creates organic amplification loop.
OOH Toronto
$320K
TTC subway stations. Yellow creative stops the thumb. Physical presence in No Name's core Canadian market.
YouTube Pre-Roll
$210K
High-intent search audiences looking up grocery prices and food inflation. Direct feeder to the calculator.
PR + Creator
$180K
Seed the index with 20 Canadian food and personal finance creators. Earned media does the heavy lifting.
Google Search
$140K
Capture "shrinkflation canada," "grocery prices 2026," and brand-adjacent queries.
Owned / Email
$70K
Price Lock Newsletter — weekly alert showing which products held size. Drives repeat visits and loyalty.
Meta + TikTok · $480KOOH Toronto · $320KYouTube Pre-Roll · $210KPR + Creator · $180KGoogle Search · $140KOwned / Email · $70K
Spend by channel ($K)
$0$100K$200K$300K$400K$480K
Section 06 / The Business Case

WHAT NO NAME
GETS BACK
ON THIS.

Simplified share-shift model. Trust capture rate drives basket switching from competitors, calculated against No Name's estimated $2.1B annual Canadian revenue base. Adjust the sliders to model different scenarios.

Adjust to model scenarios
Trust Campaign Effectiveness50%
Break-even
Campaign breaks even at 0% effectiveness — currently above break-even
Media Spend$1,400K
Calc: $2.1B revenue base × share shift × media amplifier
Projected Revenue Lift
$12.1M
On a $1.4M investment. That is a +763% return — before lunch.
Share Capture
0.34%
In a $130B Canadian grocery market, even a sub-1% shift in basket preference generates nine-figure revenue impact.
NPS Shift
+8
Benchmark: +5 to +12 for FMCG trust campaigns. Range reflects modeled scenarios.
At these settings: $12.1M return on a $1.4M investment. This campaign pays for itself.
What you just saw
THIS IS NOT
A CONCEPT DECK.
THIS IS THE PITCH.

The calculator proves shrinkflation is real and gives consumers a tool to see it themselves. The strategy explains why No Name is the right brand to own the honesty lane right now. The creative shows four formats. The media plan shows where the money goes. The business case shows what it returns.

This is the kind I build for real clients every day. The difference is I wrote this brief myself.